Delivering Quality Legal Services since 1996

Delivering Quality Legal Services since 1986

Key Takeaways from the Re Greenfrost Ltd Case: Navigating Unfair Prejudice in Business Relationships

Need Help?
Request a Call Back

In a recent ruling by the UK High Court (Re Greenfrost Ltd; Davies v O’Keeffe [2023] EWHC 5 (Ch)), the intricacies of managing company affairs after a breakdown in personal relationships were spotlighted, offering crucial lessons for directors and shareholders alike. 

This case underscores the importance of adhering to directors’ duties, maintaining open communication, and fulfilling legal obligations, particularly in times of conflict.

Background of the Case

The conflict involved two directors and equal shareholders of two companies, treated as quasi-partnerships, hinged on mutual trust and confidence.

During financial troubles, decisions made post-relationship breakdown led to significant legal challenges. The directors’ decision to sell a valuable quarry lease and the subsequent financial dealings became a point of contention, culminating in allegations of unfair prejudice against one of the directors.

Unfair Prejudice Unveiled

The court found that one director, O’Keeffe, engaged in actions that constituted unfair prejudice towards the other director, Davies. These actions included:

  • Unauthorised Withdrawals: O’Keeffe withdrew substantial sums from the company’s accounts without adequate justification, breaching trust.
  • Exclusionary Tactics: Attempts were made to sell Davies’s shares without her consent and replace her as a director, undermining her position.
  • Secret Dealings: O’Keeffe secured loans against the company’s assets without Davies’s knowledge, further excluding her from company decisions.

Court’s Decision

The court’s response was to order a buy-out of Davies’s shares at a fair valuation and to award legal costs in her favour. 

This decision highlighted the severe consequences of breaching fiduciary duties and engaging in conduct that damages the interests of fellow directors and shareholders.

Lessons for Directors

This case serves as a compelling reminder of the risks associated with intermixing personal disputes with business operations. Key lessons include:

  • Upholding Directorial Duties: Directors must prioritise the company’s interests and adhere strictly to their legal responsibilities.
  • Transparency and Communication: Effective communication and clear processes are vital, especially during disputes.
  • Legal Compliance: Observing legal standards not only avoids litigation but also supports ethical business practices.

Avoiding Similar Pitfalls

To prevent such scenarios, directors should:

  • Engage in regular audits and keep transparent records.
  • Establish clear, written agreements that outline procedures for resolving disputes.
  • Seek legal advice when personal relationships start to affect business operations.


The Re Greenfrost Ltd case is a stark reminder of the importance of maintaining ethical governance and transparent management in business. 

It emphasises that effective communication and compliance with legal standards are crucial for the smooth operation of a company and the protection of all stakeholders involved.

If you face similar challenges or need guidance on managing business disputes ethically, Onyx Solicitors is here to help. Reach out to us at or call us at 0121 268 3208 for expert legal advice tailored to your needs.


Request a Callback

Visit Us
209 Streetly Road, Birmingham, B23 7AH
Get in Touch
Landline: 0121 268 3208
Mobile:  07515 284 856
Fax: 0121 661 6116